DVD’s were great, but I think their time has come and gone. And no, I’m not talking about Blu-ray discs as the next big great thing either, because they have the main flaws of DVDs. Allow me to elaborate.
When VCR’s first invaded people’s homes, they were a revolution - not only could you record things off the television, but you could watch theatrically-released movies in the comfort of your own home whenever you wanted to. This is something we all take for granted now, but at the time, it was a pretty big deal. With the advent of DVDs, we got a huge bump in quality and durability of our movies, and the benefit of being able to jump to any chapter without the annoyance of fast forwarding/rewinding through the entire tape was a great improvement. And then the special feature was born, which allowed for all kinds of additional content to be added onto the discs for enthusiasts. Blu-ray further amps up the quality of our video and allows for even special-er features, but it fails to deliver a profound leap forward for the medium.
Here’s what I want: I want to be able to buy a movie or TV series and watch it wherever and whenever I want. DVD’s are portable, and can be watched on most computers or on portable DVD players. But portable DVD players tend to have pretty short shelf lives. (I consider myself an authority on this matter, especially after yesterday when not one, and not two, but THREE portable DVD players busted on me in a single day. That’s got to be some kind of record.) But that shouldn’t be enough - I should be able to watch these movies on my portable media device, my cell phone, or wherever else I want.
But wait, you say! I CAN do that - if I buy movies on iTunes, I can watch them on my computer and my iPod. But here’s where that model fails: if I want to watch them on my TV, I have to buy their AppleTV peripheral. And what if I don’t have an iPod - those files aren’t playable on other kinds of players. And what if I already have the DVD - why should I have to buy the movie a second time?
Of course, it is possible to take a DVD that you already own and get it to play on your iPod or PSP or any other device you have, but it requires some work. Think about how easy is it to take a CD and rip it and turn your music into digital files that will play anywhere and on anything. Why is it so much harder to do the same thing with movies?
I’ll tell you why. Because with audio files, there is a common file type that everyone accepts and uses, the mp3. Apple has pushed their own company specific format, but the DRM backlash has been strong, and now that they face competition from many other major outlets such as Amazon, even the iTunes store has started selling DRM-free mp3 files that are playable anywhere.
But even still, the music business has suffered, and so the TV and movie studios are awfully nervous. They want to keep their customers shelling out the bucks for their properties, and they hope that people will buy the same movie on DVD, UMD, Blu-ray, and on iTunes. (And worse, sometimes they do.) But isn’t there a better way?
Let’s use The Simpsons as an example. The first ten seasons (so far) have been released on DVD, and being a big fan, I have bought them all. Which is great, but what happens when I want to watch a marathon of Season Six? Every six episodes, I have to get up from my couch, open up the DVD case, take out the last DVD, insert the next one, wait for it to load, and then be told six times that copying DVDs is illegal, that the views expressed in the commentaries don’t reflect the actual views of anyone, and oh yeah, seriously, copying DVDs is a crime. Now I ask you, isn’t that analogous to the annoyance of having to fast-forward a VHS tape?
What if I could have every episode of The Simpsons ready for me to access straight from the couch? It should be easy to watch entire seasons straight through, to skip ahead, to rewind, pause, to switch on commentaries or to select bonus features, all from my remote control. But that’s not all. If I start to watch an episode but am interrupted, I should be able to continue the next day on my commute by watching on my cell phone, my iPod, or my Zen, or any other player that I have.
This could easily be done by having all of the media stored on a server, and instead of buying physical discs, you buy access to the content. You could then have access to said media from any product that is registered to you, i.e. a TV, portable player, cell phone, computer, or whatever. Easy. Oh, and if you’ve already purchased the content before, say on DVD or Blu-ray or whatever, you should be able to still get access to the same thing digitally.
Now don’t get my wrong - I want the studios to make money here, and they still would. The fundamental difference is that their business model would have to evolve from treating their customers as chumps who will shell out cash for anything, and instead treat us as valued fans. Look at how many movies have been released countless times not only on different formats, but just on DVD. (Scarface, Princess Bride, Terminator 2, and many others have seen countless “special” editions be released over the years.) The old model says that if you put the same movie in a new box, and maybe add a special feature or two, people will buy it again. Then the studios can repeat that formula on any new formats that come out.
But in my new model, you only buy the content once. Getting back to my Simpsons example, I should have access to the first ten seasons digitally (because I already paid for them on DVD), and then if I wish to buy subsequent season, I can do that. And then if Fox decides to make a high-definition copy of old seasons available, instead of re-buying what I’ve already purchased, I could just upgrade for a fee to 1080p. (And then again in a few years to 2060q or whatever comes next.) If they want to make new featurettes on anniversaries or whatever, those too would be available to purchase a la carte. Die-hard fans will keep buying upgrades and additions, and causal fans won’t. But the studios stand to make even more profits by completely cutting out the manufacturing and shipping costs associated with discs. (This whole thing is a lot more environmentally sound, too.)
You may say I’m just dreaming, and that this is just a pipe-dream that is many years away. But it shouldn’t be. If the content is good, people will pay for it. But we shouldn’t have to pay for it over and over again. Nowadays watching media just at home or just on the go isn’t enough, and it’s about time the people controlling the content accepted that.
11 users commented in " Death to DVDs! "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a Trackbacka) What the hell is 2060q?
b) While your “please producers, give me more stuff and i’ll pay less $” plan is totally realistic (and would have saved me a bundle in lifetime Galaxy Quest purchases), I doubt there’s as big enough market of people willing to pay extra for “Audio Track #4 for Iron Man - Sound Mixer Jack McGee and Costume Designer D’Amore Loure (now available in 2060q!)”
I meant to write 2160q, as in double 1080 and the letter after p. I was just making up something that could come after 1080p, making the point that it too will someday be outdated.
What makes my plan most unrealistic is the fact that people keep shelling out for multiple copies of the same thing. If people were to stop doing that and the industry were to hurt more, they would have to focus on other ways of generating revenue. But as I said, the possibility exists for a much bigger profit margin for the studios because of all the savings with digital distribution.
Sure, no one wants to hear a commentary with no-names, but maybe a new commentary with Matthew Broderick on Ferris Bueller’s Day Off would be enough to get people to shell out a few bucks for it. And considering that recording such a track would be exceedingly cheap, it could be worthwhile.
Agreed. I’ve been saying for a few years that optical media (CDs, DVDs, ETCs) is doomed (and the sooner the better).
This applies to video games as well…anything where a scratch on the disc ruins everything.
The other “biggest problem” right now is that our current bandwidth via Cable/DSL/FIOS/whatever isn’t QUITE fast enough to store ALL of our content (movies, music, pictures, games, documents) in the “Cloud”…but we’re getting there.
Media can’t be stored on a central media server for legal reasons. Basically, movie studios view it as competition for Video on Demand and are afraid that people will find a way to sniff content from other people.
More importantly, they don’t like to change their business model, even if it means the chance of more money because there is also some risk. They are making good money today and that is good enough for them. I don’t think that they care much for what the consumer wants and making it cheaper for you to do all these different things is certainly not in their interest (remember manufacturing/transmission costs are trivial so you saving money means them just making less).
your biggest complaint is that after watching 6 episodes of the simpsons, you’d have to get up from your couch?
…you could always try using this:
http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&storeId=10151&langId=-1&productId=11038348&XID=O:sony%20400%20dvd%20changer:dg_hav_gglsrch
@Uri - I would think that keeping everything in “the cloud” would be tougher for would-be pirates than keeping all the media as downloadable, but either way, some kid with a lot of time on his hands would find a way. But at the same time, people will be willing to pay when the content is good, AND when they don’t feel they are being taken advantage of.
You’re right that the big companies will be reluctant to change their business models, as they want to make more money. But keep in mind that the home video market is sagging, and there are definitely new ways for the companies to make money. If a DVD costs $19.99 now, the studio could sell access to it at the same price later. Even if the manufacturing costs are minimal, that’s still an increase in their profit margins.
And of course, there can be compromises. Like if Fox didn’t want to just give away access to people who already bought The Simpsons DVDs, they could offer a rebate of a few bucks for each DVD set that could go towards access to the new version of the content.
@meh - As much as I’d love to drop $400 on that thing, I still wouldn’t be able to watch my movies and shows on my commute.
This coming from the man who owns every updated, enhanced, etc version of Star Wars. If you can’t practice what you preach, why should anyone else?
Hold on a sec - I only own one copy of Star Wars on DVD, that happens to be the updated and enhanced version. When the separate versions came out that were UN-enhanced, I thought about getting them, but I figured the ones I had were good enough.
(How many different versions I have of the original trilogy on VHS is another story altogether…)
I think it’s precisely that: $19.99 for a dvd (and $30 for a blu-ray), when the public knows how cheap they cost to produce.
I mean, we moan, but we really don’t fret about paying $12 for a movie ticket, because we enjoy the experience. But the public hated paying $16 for a cd that they knew cost $1 to make, but they were ok paying $0.99 for the 1/16th they actually wanted. It’s as if you had to pay $120 for a 10-feature movie at the theatre.
The internet shows what a creative mind can do with the right know-how (netflix, itunes). The VOD services are all folding, but someone will get it right soon. I mean, webvans lost $300 million in startup capital, and then freshdirect does the same thing and makes a killing, all because they did it better.
But good downloadable content also won’t be ready for at least 10 years because internet speeds aren’t nearly fast enough to download 1080i movies instantly. So we’ll have to settle for the physical media for the time being.
James, I think thats mostly because albums sucked at around the time CDs were becoming popular.
According to this news story, a bunch of movie studios and retailers are working on making a “standard” DRM type of format that will be much more compatible across various formats. It’s not ideal by any stretch (especially considering that these guys just won’t let go of DRM), but it could be at the very least a step in the right direction…
Leave A Reply