randolph.jpg

Yesterday morning, the Mets fired their manager, Willie Randolph. The Mets have been a .500 or worse team so far this season, which is extremely disappointing given their $138 million dollar payroll and the talent that exists on the squad.

After last September’s historic collapse, Willie and the Mets were charged with the task of righting the ship and making a serious run for the playoffs in 2008. The addition of Johan Santana raised expectations even further, but the team just hasn’t been playing up to snuff. They have shown this season that they are capable of winning, and almost everyone on the team has had moments of brilliance.

The problem seems to be that these moments don’t happen often enough, and that when they do happen, they don’t happen consistently with the entire team. When the pitching is good, the hitting stops. When the team is hitting and the starting pitching is getting the job done, the bullpen implodes. This team has not been firing on all cylinders all year, and one could make the argument that the team hasn’t been playing to its potential since the 2006 NLCS.  Even before the team self-destructed last September, they appeared to be on cruise-control, winning just enough games but not dominating other teams as they had in 2006.

But does Willie deserve to be the scapegoat for the team’s lackluster performance? Does the team’s subpar 2008 performance undo the magic that he was able to perform in 2005 and 2006? Or is New York such a tough town that the only thing that matters is “What have you done for us lately?”

I personally am not convinced that firing Willie was the right move, but I firmly believe that the way he was fired was totally inappropriate. Firing the guy in the middle of the night, after a win, after winning three of the last four, and after the man just flew 3000 miles to the west coast is just, well, wrong. And that’s not even taking into account Willie’s crucifixion in the New York press this season.

Anyway you look at it, Willie had success with the team in the past, and that, if nothing else, merits better handling of his being let go.  He could have been fired before going to Anaheim.  Or on their next day off, which is tomorrow.  Or maybe even at the All-Star Break.  Or, if it had to be during this particular series, during normal business hours.

Whether firing Willie was the right move or not remains to be seen.  Maybe his laid-back style was hurting a team that needed to be fired up.  Or maybe just a change will do them some good.  Although you wouldn’t know it from Jerry Manuel’s first game as manager, that’s for damn sure.  Santana wasn’t at the top of his game, the Mets scored a single run on six scattered hits, and they committed three errors.  Oh, and then there was Reyes’ tantrum.  The team looked and played just as they have all year: sloppily.

To be fair, Willie lost his first five games as manager in 2005, and was still able to lead the team to an above .500 finish.  Maybe Manuel will have similar luck with the team, and after a brief adjustment period, he’ll be able to get the Mets to play up to their potential.

That said, a five game losing streak is certainly not what the Mets need right now.  What they really need, at the end of the day, is to start playing better baseball.  My fingers are firmly crossed that Jerry Manuel can make that happen.  And fast.