![]()
![]()
I know, who would have thought such a title would ever be so true?
Here’s the story in a nutshell: Ben Stein (yes, the guy from Ferris Bueller’s Day Off and Win Ben Stein’s Money) is the star and co-writer of a new documentary called “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed,” which claims that “Big Science has expelled smart new ideas from the classroom” (that’s quoted from the official site - you can check it if you want, but linking to it would make me feel dirty) by teaching evolution over intelligent design. The movie used a 15 second clip of John Lennon’s song “Imagine,” and Yoko Ono sued the filmmakers because they did not have her permission to do so, and she is the copyright holder. The Judge in the case said that the use of Imagine falls under fair use, a clause that allows for brief usage of copyrighted material without getting permission first.
I’m no expert on fair use, but to me it doesn’t necessarily seem like the use of “Imagine” in this movie would necessarily fall into that category, since the song is not about evolutionary theory specifically. Although the fact that they only used 15 seconds does make the filmmakers’ case stronger. Still, for them to claim fair use, they would have to show how the use of the song is integral to the film. The portion of the song in question contains the lyric, “Nothing to kill or die for, and no religion too, “and the filmmakers’ lawyer argues that the clip is important to the movie because “it represents the most popular and persuasive embodiment of this viewpoint that the world is better off without religion. [The film is] asking if John Lennon was right and it’s concluding he was wrong.”
So the point of the movie is that we need religion in our society. But wait - I thought it was a documentary advocating intelligent design?
Oh, that’s right - they are one and the same.
Intelligent design is quite simply religion masquerading as science, and the filmmakers’ argument for using this song is an open admission of that fact.
I’m not going to get in to the whole intelligent design vs. evolution issue, mainly because there is nothing to debate. Intelligent design is not a valid scientific theory, it is a way for some religious fanatics to “prove” the existence of a divine presence. Which, by the way, goes against the literal definition of faith: “belief in something for which there is no proof.”
And that’s why I am forced to take the side of the lady who broke up the Beatles over a guy who played a classic 80’s movie character. I never thought I’d live to see THAT day, I tell ya…
4 users commented in " Yoko Ono is Right, Ben Stein is Wrong "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackOk… so I was trying to look up some information online so that I’d sound intelligent with my comment. First off, I totally agree with you hubby, yet maybe I have to since we’re married now. But anyways, I googled “intelligent design versus evolution” and the first website that pops up is for an “intelligent design versus evolution” boardgame that was developed by none other than Kirk Cameron (and some other guy who I don’t know). Kirk… what has happened to you? I used to love you on Growing Pains, but since high school when I was forced to watch you and your wife advocate abstinence on videos for health class and now this… I’ve simply lost all respect. Now, Ben Stein you may have to be put on the list as well.
As a scientist, I see too many flaws in the ID agrument. Just think about that oh-so-wonderful organelle, the powerhouse of the cell, THE MITOCHONDRIA. It didn’t just appear. It evolved from an independent organism and was taken up by the eukaryotic cell. Those who support ID are simply lacking a strong scientific background. I certainly don’t claim to know everything about economic trends since I’ve never taken a business/econ class in my life. So, I think that it’s absurd that those like Ben Stein and Kirk Cameron are trying to serve as authorities on the origin of life. Get your Ph.D. in biology and then we’ll talk!
By the way, I did come across an interesting debate on the matter at http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/nhmag.html Check it out… it does present both sides of the argument.
People, people, people. Don’t call it that. Pshh. Intelligent design. Please. It’s CREATIONISM. It was creationism since creationism was created. Then the fundamentalists decided the word creationism had an old-fashioned, backwards stigma (unfortunately that’s not because of the name, but because of those who argued against evolution). So they changed it to intelligent design. This happened very recently. In fact it happened so recently, that if you were to take the entire time our planet has existed and scale it down to a 24-hour day, this crap happened like as the clock was turning midnight.
So you probably think by now that I’m anti-creationism. Not at all. I believe it entirely, but I know it’s not true. How the hell is that possible? One is science, one is religion. I take the writings of my religion for their purpose to use in the future, not to argue history of the past. Like Adam and Eve. Sexist as hell by the way, but the point is not that they were the first hairless monkeys with opposable thumbs (past), but that we’re all flawed and will sin and must struggle to resist temptation (lesson for the future).
Someone who takes this as verbatim fact gets the fundamentalism award, and is unfortunately thrust into the same category as the Muslim who believes there are actually a bunch of virgins waiting for them in heaven.
But back to Yoko. I never liked Imagine, mostly because of the whole line about “imagine no religion.” Sadly John was focused by the 10% who make 99% of the noise. Sigh. The fundamentalists. The Ben Steins, the Kirk Camerons, the suicide bombers, the polygamists pedaphiles and everybody in between. He was saying imagine if religion hadn’t guided these people astray. It’s not religion. These people would have found a reason and a justification for their insanity with or without religion. Even when religion does bad it’s usually a troubled mind finding a selective interpretation to what they’re reading. You could certainly find some horrible quotes to blame the text and not the reader, but that’s just why you don’t read these things alone in a dark room. You don’t blame a religion when someone blasphemes it (or just doesn’t understand it, which we’re all guilty of). You don’t do that any more than you blame the Christmas Carol for sounded like crap when my mom, sister, and Aunt all get together to sing it.
So I’m very anti-Imagine lyrics, although I like the actual melody a lot, and I’m strongly anti-creationism yet religiously I subscribe to it. But what do I know, I like the Monkees better than the Beatles. Both misspelled versions of God’s little creatures. On the eighth day man created Youtube, and I’m gonna go listen to Daydream Believer.
@The Wife - I knew you agreed with me, but you make a good point that these celebrity advocates of intelligent design are not scientists. Stein may be smart, but being a lawyer does not make one an expert in biology. Also the article you link to makes for some interesting reading.
@Clinton - You touch on an interesting point, namely that it is possible to believe in religion and evolution, yet to believe in creationism, you by definition must believe in a higher power. That’s an important point because, as evidenced by the lawyer’s argument above, creationists and intelligent design advocates paint evolution as anti-religion, and it isn’t. It’s science, and science and faith don’t have to be mutually exclusive. Who’s to say that it wasn’t a divine influence that created the inherently intricate system of evolution?
So do Ben Stein and Kirk Cameron think that the scripts for Ferris Bueller and Growing Pains were created miraculously by an intelligent designer? Ferris maybe, but Growing Pains? Like it wasn’t bad enough when they added little Chrissy, they had to go and add a homeless teen played by Leonardo DiCaprio, too? Where was the divine inspiration there?
I’ve always interpreted ‘and no religion too’ not as being directed at extremists, but at how religion helps segregate typical everyday people.
Leave A Reply